Realism vs. Liberalism

This research paper discusses the philosophical differences between Realism and Liberalism. Throughout history, these two schools of thought have been at odds with one another, as they offer opposite solutions to international political issues. Realism is a conservative approach to foreign policy that focuses on maintaining power, while Liberalism typically prioritizes cooperation over competition.

Realists believe in exercising power and leveraging military strength against other nations for protection and security. They prioritize national sovereignty and are not inclined towards multilateral agreements or organizations. Conversely, Liberals favor diplomacy and communication as methods for resolving conflicts. They value international cooperation and global institutions such as the United Nations (UN) because it helps promote peaceful relations among states.

These two perspectives reflect a fundamental difference in how people view the world. Realists see the international arena as a place that is driven by power and competition, while Liberals believe it should be characterized by cooperation and trust.

There are different ideologies within these two schools of thought. Traditional Realists, for example, prioritize maintaining a balance of power through military strength and alliances with other nations. Neorealists emphasize the point that international relations are essentially anarchic and unpredictable. Meanwhile, Liberal Institutionalists put their faith in global institutions like the UN to help solve international disputes peacefully.

Through this research paper, we will explore the differences between Realism and Liberalism by surveying their respective philosophical foundations, contrasting their approaches towards foreign policy and discussing how they have shaped current affairs. Ultimately, we aim to gain a better understanding of these two competing ideologies so that we can make more informed decisions about our own foreign policies in the future.

By evaluating both perspectives objectively, we can see how Realism and Liberalism are both valid political theories with their own merits. Although they may not agree on the best methods for achieving international peace, it is important to recognize that each has something valuable to offer in terms of understanding and responding to international issues. In this way, we can use a balanced perspective to identify the most effective solutions for any given situation. Ultimately, by recognizing and respecting both sides of the debate, we can create an environment where everyone’s interests are respected and protected.

This research paper seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of Realism and Liberalism—their ideologies, philosophies, goals and influences—in order to gain a better understanding of these two schools of thought.