Is it ethical to use drugs if they were legal?

This paper explores ethics and morality surrounding drug use, in particular, whether it is ethical to use drugs if they were legal. It will first provide a brief overview of the ethical theories of deontology and utilitarianism. It will then apply these theories to the question of drug use, evaluating the pros and cons of each position. Ultimately, it will be up to the reader to decide which position is more persuasive.

Deontology is an ethical theory that focuses on duties and obligations. According to deontologists, there are certain things we ought or ought not to do, regardless of the consequences. For example, we have a duty not to lie, even if doing so would lead to good outcomes. In contrast, utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focus on the consequences of our actions. Utilitarians believe that we should always choose the option that will lead to the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

So, which ethical theory is more applicable to the question of drug use? On the one hand, deontologists could argue that it is our duty not to harm ourselves, and using drugs is clearly harmful to our health. On the other hand, utilitarians could argue that the harm caused by drug use is outweighed by the benefits, such as increased pleasure or decreased pain.

Additionally, drug use raises complex questions of autonomy and self-ownership. Deontologists could argue that we have a duty to respect the autonomy of others, and that includes respecting their decision to use drugs. Utilitarians could argue that drug use can lead to negative consequences for others, such as addiction or overdose, and so it is not always in everyone’s best interest.

These are just some of the arguments that can be made for each position. Ultimately, it will be up to the reader to decide which position is more persuasive.