Jun 11, 2022
This paper is a Renaissance essay discussing three different interpretations of Masaccio’s fresco Tribute Money in the context of the Petrine cycle of frescos in the Brancacci Chapel, in the Piazza del Carmine.
The first interpretation views the painting as a literal depiction of an event from the Bible. In this reading, the figures in the painting represent Christ and his disciples, and the tribute money refers to the tax that was due to Rome. This interpretation is supported byMasaccio’s use of classical proportions and perspective.
The second interpretation sees the painting as a political statement. In this view, Masaccio is criticizing Rome for its corruption and its mistreatment of the people. This interpretation is supported by the fact that the painting was done during a time of great unrest in Florence.
The third interpretation views the painting as a statement about the human condition. In this reading, the figures in the painting represent all humanity, and the tribute money represents our need for redemption. This interpretation is supported by Masaccio’s use of light and shadow to create a sense of depth and distance.
No matter which interpretation is correct, it is clear thatMasaccio’s Tribute Money is a complex and thought-provoking work of art. It is an important part of the Petrine cycle of frescos, and it provides us with a glimpse into the mind of one of the greatest artists of the Renaissance.
Some art historians have put forward the view that Masaccio’s Tribute Money fresco in the Brancacci Chapel commemorates the treaty between Florence and Mamluk Egypt. This perspective is based on the fact that some of the figures in the painting are dressed in Mamluk-style clothing.
This interpretation has some merit, as there is no other known instance of Mamluk-style clothing being depicted in a Renaissance painting. However, it is also possible that Masaccio simply used Mamluk-style clothing because it was fashionable at the time.
Some art historians have interpreted Masaccio’s Tribute Money as a reflection of a Christian eschatology elaborated by St. Augustine. In this view, the painting is seen as an allegory for the Last Judgment. The figures in the painting represent different types of sinners, and the tribute money refers to the sin of avarice.
This interpretation is supported by the fact that Masaccio was a follower of St. Augustine, and by the symbolism of the colors in the painting. However, it is also possible that Masaccio simply used Augustine’s eschatology as a starting point for his own thoughts on the human condition.
Our team consists of professionals with an array of knowledge in different fields of study