Euthanasia justified: Killing for mercy

This essay explores the idea that euthanasia can be seen as a justified act in some cases. The essay will firstly define euthanasia before discussing the various arguments for and against the practice. The conclusion reached is that while there are some valid concerns about euthanasia, in certain situations it can be seen as the most humane option available.

What is euthanasia?

Euthanasia is generally defined as the act of ending a life in order to relieve suffering (“Euthanasia”, 2016). There are two main types of euthanasia: active and passive. Active euthanasia involves taking steps to end a life, such as administering a lethal injection. Passive euthanasia, on the other hand, refers to withholding or withdrawing treatment that is necessary to keep a person alive. For the purposes of this essay, active euthanasia will be the focus as it is the more controversial of the two.

Arguments for euthanasia

There are a number of reasons why people may argue that euthanasia is justified in some cases. One common argument is that everyone has a right to die with dignity. This means that people should be able to choose when and how they die, rather than having to endure a prolonged and painful death. Another argument in favour of euthanasia is that it can save people from suffering. For example, if someone is terminally ill and their death is inevitable, allowing them to die sooner may be seen as the most humane option.

Arguments against euthanasia

While there are a number of arguments in favour of euthanasia, there are also a number of objections to the practice. One common concern is that legalising euthanasia could lead to abuse. For example, if people know that they can end their lives at any time, they may be more likely to do so even if they are not suffering from a terminal illness. Another objection to euthanasia is that it goes against the Hippocratic Oath, which is a pledge made by medical professionals to do no harm. This means that helping someone to die, even if they are in pain, may be seen as a breach of this oath.

Conclusion

While there are some valid concerns about euthanasia, in certain situations it can be seen as the most humane option available. In cases where a person is suffering from a terminal illness and their death is inevitable, euthanasia may be the best way to relieve their suffering. Similarly, if someone has a debilitating condition that causes them constant pain and there is no hope of recovery, euthanasia may be seen as the best option. In these cases, allowing the person to die with dignity may be seen as the most compassionate course of action.