Circumcision as a Human Rights Issue in the US

This paper discusses the human rights implications of male circumcision in the United States. It will examine key points raised by both proponents and opponents of circumcision, as well as exploring wider ethical considerations that may be relevant to this debate. To begin with, it is important to note that circumcision has become a highly politicized issue in recent years, with many groups arguing that it should not be performed on minors without their consent. This has raised questions about the right of parents to make decisions on behalf of their children, as well as whether or not performing this procedure constitutes a violation of the child's bodily autonomy.

The medical community has been divided over the issue for decades. Proponents argue that there are potential health benefits associated with circumcision and cite studies indicating that it may reduce the risk of certain diseases, such as urinary tract infections and sexually transmitted infections. They also suggest that uncircumcised men may be more likely to develop phimosis, balanoposthitis, and penile cancer. On the other hand, opponents of circumcision point out that there is no clear evidence to support these claims and question why a medically unnecessary procedure should be performed on minors without their consent.

The debate has also raised ethical questions about informed consent, human dignity, and cultural customs. Many proponents argue that circumcision is a harmless procedure with only minor risks involved; however some critics contend that it violates basic human rights by altering an individual's body without their permission. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has weighed in on the issue, stating that while it is not medically necessary, circumcision should be done only with informed consent and parental permission.

Ultimately, the debate about male circumcision in the United States is likely to continue for some time. While there may be potential medical benefits associated with this procedure, these must be balanced against ethical considerations such as autonomy and human dignity. Ultimately, it is up to individuals and families to decide whether or not they wish to pursue circumcision - and if so, whether or not a minor can give their informed consent. Additionally, any legal and legislative efforts to regulate circumcision must take into account both sides of the debate before making a decision about its future legality.